Saturday, June 28, 2014

CHARLESTON'S GHOSTS: HAUNTINGS IN THE HOLY CITY: A Review

-----------------------------------------------------------------

James Caskey has continued his paranormal exploration of major Southern cities with this casually brilliant tour though Charleston's ghost stories, weird paranormal events and dark history. As he did so well in the books, "Haunted History of New Orleans" and "Haunted Savannah", Caskey deconstructs many of Charleston's famous (and infamous) ghost stories and puts them in the proper historical perspective.

This is less a "ghost story book" than a historical re-evaluation of those stories. It strips away some of the ridiculous flourishes added by tour guides, other writers and locals through the years. It can easily be read for pure enjoyment and then set on the shelf to be used for reference purposes for years to come. Bravo, Mr. Caskey!

NEVER GO BACK: A Review



I hate to say it … but after 18 books, Reacher is starting to suffer from the Spenser Syndrome: a great character that is becoming redundant. 

Robert B. Parker’s Spenser novels were phenomenal books until about #14 … then trouble seeps in. And the more Spenser’s main squeeze, Susan Silverman, is involved in the story, the worse it is. 

Same with Child. Reacher is one of the most interesting characters but over the last few novels, (particularly with the recent stand-alone short e-books) Child has seemed to be grasping. When you start going back to the character’s childhood, things are starting to jump the shark. It’s the TV sit-com rule … introduce a baby when you’ve run out of ideas. 

The storyline of “Never Go Back” pushes incredulity (even for a Reacher book), and the final dissolution of the plot is … well, lame. They even introduce a baby – a sub-plot about Reacher having father a child 14 years before - that is hard to believe, particularly when the 14-year old kid acts like a 35 year old war veteran. 

Here’s hoping that in his next book Reacher runs into Susan Silverman, kills her and Spenser and Hawk vow revenge. The three have a showdown in which all of them die. 

BIBLIO says:  If you've been reading the Reacher series, read it ... it not .. don't bother.

Friday, August 27, 2010

THE PASSAGE: A Review

MarkJonesBooks.com
-------------------------------------------

First, the good things.

There is NO Bella in this book. No misty eyed teenage romance. There is no soul-searching Lestat who laments his life in overlong paragraphs filled with purple prose. There is no erudite Count with a cape. No Victorian damsels in flimsy nightgowns and heaving bosoms. In Justin Cronin's The Passage, the "vampires" are the result of a military genetic experiment gone horribly wrong and ultimately, out of control. They are vicious, nasty, virtually unstoppable and very very hungry. The first 250 pages of The Passage are the best fiction I have read this year.

Now the bad: Unfortunately, the book is 766 pages long. With two sequels on the way.

The novel covers over 1000 years. The first section follows modern day events. A military/ scientific expedition in South America captures a jungle virus and takes the secret to a lab for study. They discover the virus increases strength in test monkeys and prolongs their lifespan. The government hatches plans to create a Super Soldier. FBI agent Brad Wolgast is put on special assignment with the military to bring "volunteer test subjects" from death row prisons across America to be infected with the virus. But when Wolgast is ordered by his military superiors to capture a 10 year old girl, Amy, and deliver her to the lab, he rebels. The army hunts them down and Amy is taken to the lab to be tested. Then, the world goes to hell.

Twelve of the infected creatures escape the lab and overnight destroy the entire military installation. Wolgast and Amy barely escape and spend the next several years living in isolation. Then ... one day there is a brilliant explosion to the west. Amy is blinded by the nuclear blast, and Wolgast slowly dies of radiation poisoning.

The book then jumps 1000 years in the future. The creatures (called Virals or Jumps) have wiped out most of the human population. Ninety per cent of infected humans die - ten per cent become Virals themselves.

What follows is an alternately entertaining, horrific, tedious and ultimately, frustrating apocalyptic story of the human survivors and their civilization. This is where author Justin Cronin falls woefully short of his goals. Having published two short modern and very literary novels, Cronin branches into territory usually reserved for such "inferior" writers as Stephen King, Robert MacCammon and Richard Matheson. When "serious" writers stoop to write horror or science fiction - genre fiction! - the result is usually well-written crap.


(U.K. cover)


Several years ago we got the novel Jonathon Strange & Mr. Norrel, an old fashioned English novel about magic and evil. The literary world loved it ... heaped praise upon and claimed that it "redefined the horror novel." It redefined it as tedious and stodgy. The Historian was also forced upon us as a "brilliant re-working of the vampire legend." The only brilliant thing about the book was it's ad campaign. The book was literary sawdust. Remember when Norman Mailer (a literary giant, just ask him) claimed he could write a great mystery novel, and we got Tough Guys Don't Dance? If you actually finished that book, your place in heaven is assured. Those of us going to hell will probably have to reread it for eternity.

There are sections of The Passage, and I mean dozens of pages, that beg to be skipped. Cronin often forgets he is NOT writing a mainstream novel where nothing is supposed to happen. He has chosen to write a genre novel for money ... and of course, he can make it better than those popular writers because, after all ... he is a serious novelist.

If you really want to read this kind of story, I recommend 2009's The Strain, with a similar story and sweep (volume 2 is being published this fall, our copy has already be pre-ordered) or how about two all time apocalyptic classics: The Stand by Stephen King and Swan Song by Robert MacCammon. Those two pulp writers managed to write a couple of horrific novels that are everything The Passage isn't ... great. Click here to read a list of great apocalyptic fiction.

For all it's posturing (and intellectual promotion among the literary elites) The Passage is not a bad novel, just not a good one. I'm betting the Hollywood movie will be better than the book.



Tuesday, June 22, 2010

THIS BODY OF DEATH: A Review

MarkJonesBooks.com
---------------------------------------------------

Thanks goodness Elizabeth George has returned with a huge dose of Barbara Havers.

For the uninitiated, Havers is the unpolished working class detective sgt. who is partnered with the ultimately urbane Inspector Thomas Lynley (the Eighth Earl of Asherton) of New Scotland Yard. The Lynley mysteries are the best written and plotted detective novels of the past 20 years. In each novel dozens of richly drawn characters and their messy lives are expertly woven into the story as Lynley and Havers are drawn into their world due to a murder. But the best part of the books is the complicated, multi-layered relationship between Havers and Lynley.

The previous novel in the Lynley series, Careless in Red, was 99% Lynley. It followed Lynley during his eight month bereavement leave-of-absence after the murder of his wife, Helen, which was covered in the book With No One As Witness. I, for one, applaud George for killing off a major character in a successful series. Like most readers, I had become frustrated with Helen (and her relationship with Lynley.) She was an annoying character who, with each appearance on page, irritated everyone reading. So, George killed her off and created a new dynamic for the entire series. Too bad Robert B. Parker never had the courage to do the same thing in his SPENSER series - to kill off the most annoying character in modern fiction, Susan Silverman.

In This Body of Death, Lynley returns to duty to assist the new department chief, Isabelle Ardrey. Havers and Ardrey are already at odds when Lynley arrives. Ardrey is horrified by Havers typical attire (mismatched socks, T-shirt with an off color slogan, and food-stained pants.) Ardrey is a hard woman, whose management style rubs everyone in the department the wrong way. She also has several personal problems - a bitter custody fight with her husband over their two children, and ducking into the bathroom to suck down mini-bottles of vodka.

In addition, Ardrey mismanages her detective crew (in Havers' opinion) and directs the murder investigation in the wrong direction. Lynley attempts to subtly help her steer the case in a proper manner, and Havers (as she is wont to do) disobeys orders and follows her own hunches in the investigation. Havers also is horrified to pick up the vibe that Lynley and Ardrey may becoming romantically involved!

Welcome back Elizabeth George, and Barbara Havers.

BILBIO SAYS: Read it, read it, read it.


Saturday, June 5, 2010

SUREFIRE SUMMER BOOKS


The phrase "beach book" should conjure up certain images: a paperback novel, plot heavy and fun to read. A thriller, a comedy, a good mystery. Here are a few surefire books to get you through the hot days of summer.
--------------------------------------

THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE by Pat Conroy. Conroy's breakout novel. Thrilling, passionate and impossible to put down.

ENDER'S GAME by Orson Scott Card. The great sci-fi novel for people who don't usually read sci-fi. Trust me, read this book.

EYE OF THE NEEDLE by Ken Follett. Simply put: one of the greatest thrillers ever written.

THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO / THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNET'S NEST by Stieg Larsson. Two stunning crime novels featuring an unusual protagonist.

THE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO THE UNIVERSE by Douglas Adams. As close to the Bible of great reads as you can get.

HARRY POTTER SERIES by J. K. Rowling. Each volume is good, and each volume is better than the previous one.

THE STAND / SALEM'S LOT by Stephen King. The "King of beach reads."

WATCHERS / STRANGERS by Dean Koontz. The second "King of beach reads."

TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD by Harper Lee. It's not often that a "classic" is also a compelling beach book.

THE PRINCESS BRIDE by William Goldman. As the source material for the movie everybody loves, almost no one has read this delightful (and surprisingly rich and compelling) novel.

SKIN TIGHT /NATIVE TONGUE / SICK PUPPY by Carl Hiaasen. Master of the comic crime novel. Wacky and exciting.

A TOWN LIKE ALICE by Nevil Shute. THE romance book. Harrowing and sweet at the same time.

THE TOMB / LEGACIES / CONSPIRACIES by F. Paul Wilson. The end of the world is coming, so better start reading the Repairman Jack novels to get yourself up to speed. Here are the first three (of fifteen.)

THE WORLD ACCORDING TO GARP by John Irving. Irving's masterpiece. We are all terminal cases.

TARA ROAD / QUENTINS by Maeve Binchey. A great Irish writer doing what she does best, telling stories of real people and their day-to-day lives.

THE SCARLET RUSE / THE GREEN RIPPER by John D. MacDonald. Two of the best of the "Travis McGee" mysteries.

REPLAY by Ken Grimwood. What if you could live your life over again, and over, and over?

CARRION COMFORT by Dan Simmons. Epic horror about psychic vampires. Stunning.

Monday, May 24, 2010

CITY OF DREAMS: A Review

MarkJonesBooks
-----------------------------------------------

Two years before Indiana Jones. Twenty years before Benjamin Franklin Gates (Nicholas Cage's character in National Treasure). And even before Robert Langdon of The DaVinci Code, there was Peter Fallon. If William Martin, the creator of Fallon, isn't sharing in the profits of the Treasure and Langdon movies, then he should be!

In 1979, Martin introduced Peter Martin in a superb historical thriller called Back Bay. And over the twenty years he has proven himself to the premier historical novelist of this generation. All the historical grandeur of Michener with none of the bad writing and tedious plots. Back Bay is the book that established his formula, and which the National Treasure producers use to great success. Alternating narratives: one that follows events in history, and the second which follows historian and collector of antiquities Peter Fallon in his search for some lost historical object. Gradually the two plots line merge to a roaring finish.

In Bay the object is silver tea set, made by Paul Revere and given to George Washington. After the War of 1812 the tea set disappears the in the late 20th century Peter Fallon uncovers some clues about the set and begins to pull the thread of history apart. In Harvard Yard it is a lost Shakespeare manuscript. In The Lost Constitution it is an annotated (by the writers) copy of the Constitution that was stolen at the Convention.

And now in City of Dreams Fallon is after some lost Revolutionary War bonds sold my Alexander Hamilton to pay for the Patriot rebellion. Seems like, due to a clause in the Constitution, that the bonds may still redeemable and the lost batch could be worth more than one billion dollars!

While no one will ever accuse Martin of being a great writer, he is a good one. And he is a masterful researcher who knows how to turn tidbits of research into fascinating (and plausible) fiction. All of Martin's books are enjoyable and you will come away with a deeper knowledge of history, and (hopefully) a desire to delve into the subject matter more deeply. Can a historical novelist ask for anything more? Maybe a share of the National Treasure profits, but ... I'm sure Mr. Martin is not holding his breath.

BIBLIO SAYS: Highly recommended for a great read.



Tuesday, May 18, 2010

MEN AND DOGS: A Review


-----------------------------------

This is an easy review. I did not finish the book. Why? It's written in present tense, a death knell for fiction. Ms. Crouch, tell me one reason that this novel is better because of the present tense narrative point-of-view.

Oh, you argue, a few sections of the book are in the past tense POV. So, why is that? Would the book have been weakened if the entire novel was written in past tense POV?

Answer: No. So, the reason you chose the alternating present/past POV is merely an attempt to be hip, cool, modern?

Sorry, that's no good enough. All it did was annoy the hell out of me. It made me pay attention to the style and distracted from your story, a cardinal sin for fiction. It is nothing more than your pathetic plea to the reader: "Look at me, I'm a WRITER!"

And a poor one at that, Ms. Crouch.

BIBLIO SAYS: Avoid like syphilis.